I am sorry to have missed filling this column several times. Change since this book outstanding, I had to give an account of the thoughts I am to the public. Many a true story about the changes that I have met and of course thousands of them are willing to confide reviled for the sake of change.
Become a Change Maker is not easy. An anonymous letter, SMS false, defamatory, until efforts often deadly physical must be faced. To this group, I can only say, Gandhi whose face was just so nice and soothing behavior, they kill, especially since you are a nobody.
The biggest problem people in an era of change is actually only one, that dare not accept the new realities. Most of the employees, executives and bureaucrats that I met are still chained to the success stories in the past. They think the solution they found in the past that the real solution.
The proof is, that is a bonus and welfare. Lunch is provided, and employees can take turns playing musical instruments. Why do not we use the same way to solve the problem today? As a stalemate, many people who suddenly start using the word "First ......" when starting the conversation to refer to the past.
Rays of light shining on a business can mean benefits, but also can be harm. IBM for example, success with mainframe computers in 70'an him to deny the reality
The new PC market. Motorola even more serious. After the success of analog Cellular, he denied the presence of digital mobile phones by making new investments in the field of analog. Xerox also had difficult while denying the reality of the emergence of the personal-copier market, released Minolta, Canon and Ricoh. Encyclopedia Britannica also deny the reality of a new book that played smart by Microsoft (Encarta).
In Indonesia alone there are thousands of businesses who also denied the new realities. Friends in the middle of the plantation denies the fact that the world community have started to drink tea
without the tea leaves at all. Today, even the greatest struggles facing public universities. There are so many new realities that have emerged and they continue to argue with the use of measures to assess long day tomorrow. They use these experiences to school full time duration with difficulty frame on a new generation moving in a different way. And to them, Albert Einstein once stated, "the measure of intelligence is the ability to change" (a measure of your intelligence is your ability to change, accept the new reality).
Hard to imagine nowadays there are still many people who lived at the time yesterday and allowed to continue to head the activities to bring the organization into the past, but this also happens because
left the organization controlled by the "hinterland" of the day spent
his time in office without interacting with the outside world at all.
In every institution we easily distinguish, where the "hinterland" and which "coast". The coast is always interacting with the outside world, but he brings a lot of things
new. He is more receptive to new facts. Instead the interior tend to
maintain the tradition. A senior businessman I whisper, now, he said, "tradition is a number one killer!". I think there real.
Become a Change Maker is not easy. An anonymous letter, SMS false, defamatory, until efforts often deadly physical must be faced. To this group, I can only say, Gandhi whose face was just so nice and soothing behavior, they kill, especially since you are a nobody.
The biggest problem people in an era of change is actually only one, that dare not accept the new realities. Most of the employees, executives and bureaucrats that I met are still chained to the success stories in the past. They think the solution they found in the past that the real solution.
The proof is, that is a bonus and welfare. Lunch is provided, and employees can take turns playing musical instruments. Why do not we use the same way to solve the problem today? As a stalemate, many people who suddenly start using the word "First ......" when starting the conversation to refer to the past.
Rays of light shining on a business can mean benefits, but also can be harm. IBM for example, success with mainframe computers in 70'an him to deny the reality
The new PC market. Motorola even more serious. After the success of analog Cellular, he denied the presence of digital mobile phones by making new investments in the field of analog. Xerox also had difficult while denying the reality of the emergence of the personal-copier market, released Minolta, Canon and Ricoh. Encyclopedia Britannica also deny the reality of a new book that played smart by Microsoft (Encarta).
In Indonesia alone there are thousands of businesses who also denied the new realities. Friends in the middle of the plantation denies the fact that the world community have started to drink tea
without the tea leaves at all. Today, even the greatest struggles facing public universities. There are so many new realities that have emerged and they continue to argue with the use of measures to assess long day tomorrow. They use these experiences to school full time duration with difficulty frame on a new generation moving in a different way. And to them, Albert Einstein once stated, "the measure of intelligence is the ability to change" (a measure of your intelligence is your ability to change, accept the new reality).
Hard to imagine nowadays there are still many people who lived at the time yesterday and allowed to continue to head the activities to bring the organization into the past, but this also happens because
left the organization controlled by the "hinterland" of the day spent
his time in office without interacting with the outside world at all.
In every institution we easily distinguish, where the "hinterland" and which "coast". The coast is always interacting with the outside world, but he brings a lot of things
new. He is more receptive to new facts. Instead the interior tend to
maintain the tradition. A senior businessman I whisper, now, he said, "tradition is a number one killer!". I think there real.
